The Dialectical History of Religion

The Dialectical History of Religion



Welcome to the intriguing world of the Dialectical History of Religion! To know what a dialectic is, refer to my blog post on Hegel. This unique framework traces the evolution of the major world religious thought through a series of dialectical relationships, unveiling the interplay between opposing ideas and their harmonious synthesis. Divided into three branches, this historical journey invites us to explore the dynamic nature of human spirituality. This is only a draft and much work is needed to be done! Let me know where I can improve in the comments below.

 

1. First Branch:

Thesis: Eclectic Spirituality

Antithesis: Nihilism

Synthesis: Animism

Thesis: Animism

Antithesis: Materialism

Synthesis: Shamanism

Thesis: Shamanism

Antithesis: General Atheism

Synthesis: General Deism

Thesis: General Deism

Antithesis: General Polytheism

Synthesis: Monotheism*

Thesis: Monotheism

Antithesis: Ancient Paganism

Synthesis: Judaism

Thesis: Judaism
Antithesis: Ancient Reform Judaism**

Synthesis: Jewish Pharisees

Thesis: Jewish Pharisees

Antithesis: Jewish Sadducees

Synthesis: Rabbinic Judaism

Thesis: Rabbinic Judaism

Antithesis: Greek Paganism
Synthesis: Hellenistic Judaism

Thesis: Hellenistic Judaism

Antithesis: Jewish Zealot Messianic Movements
Synthesis: Jamesonian Christianity

Thesis: Jamesonian Christianity

Antithesis: Pauline movements

Synthesis: Proto-Orthodox Christianity

Thesis: Proto-Orthodox Christianity

Antithesis: Arianism

Synthesis: Nicene Christianity

Thesis: Nicene Christianity

Antithesis: Nestorianism and Monophysitism

Synthesis: Chalcedonian Christianity

Thesis: Chalcedonian Christianity

Antithesis: Unitarian Christianity

Synthesis: Sunni Islam

Thesis: Sunni Islam

Antithesis: Shia Islam

Synthesis: Ibadi Islam

Thesis: Ibadi Islam

Antithesis: Sufism

Synthesis: Ismailism

Thesis: Ismailism

Antithesis: Hinduism
Synthesis: Sikhism

Thesis: Sikhism

Antithesis: Baháʼí Faith

Synthesis: Religious Pluralism

Thesis: Religious Pluralism

Antithesis: Dogmatic Fundamentalism

Synthesis: New-Age Spirituality

Thesis: New-Age Spirituality

Antithesis: New-Age Atheism

Synthesis Eclectic Spirituality

 

2. Second Branch:

Thesis: Eclectic Spirituality

Antithesis: General Atheism

Synthesis: General Deism

Thesis: General Deism

Antithesis: General Polytheism

Synthesis: Monotheism

Thesis: Monotheism

Antithesis: Paganism

Synthesis: Spiritual Hinduism

Thesis: Spiritual Hinduism

Antithesis: Analytical Hinduism

Synthesis: Advaita Vedanta

Thesis: Advaita Vedanta

Antithesis: Dvaita Vedanta

Synthesis: Vaishnavism/Vishishtadvaita Vedanta

Thesis: Vaishnavism

Antithesis: Theravada Buddhism* 

Synthesis: Jainism

Thesis: Jainism

Antithesis: Sikhism

Synthesis: Religious Pluralism

Thesis: Religious Pluralism

Antithesis: Dogmatic Fundamentalism

Synthesis: New-Age Spirituality

Thesis: New-Age Spirituality

Antithesis: New-Age Atheism

Synthesis Eclectic Spirituality

 

3. Third Branch:

Thesis: Theravada Buddhism

Antithesis: Mahayana Buddhism

Synthesis: Zen Buddhism

Thesis: Zen Buddhism

Antithesis: Confucianism

Synthesis: Taoism

Antithesis: Humanism**

Synthesis: Religious Pluralism

Thesis: Religious Pluralism

Antithesis: Dogmatic Fundamentalism

Synthesis: New-Age Spirituality

Thesis: New-Age Spirituality

Antithesis: New-Age Atheism

Synthesis Eclectic Spirituality

 

*Branch Split
**Placeholder

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Refutation of the Ashariyyah Aqidah

Image
Refutation of the Ashariyyah Aqidah   Aqidah:   Ash’ari beliefs:   1. Divine timelessness i.e. that Allah سُبْحَانَهُ وَتَعَالَىٰ does not perform new sequential actions Himself. 2. Allah سُبْحَانَهُ وَتَعَالَىٰ acts without motive or wisdom behind His acts as they believe if Allah was acting to fulfill a purpose then He would have been previously imperfect as He would be in need of something. 3. Metaphorical interpretations of Allah’s actions and attributes in order to avoid anthropomorphism. 4. Occasionalism i.e. the belief that God is the only true cause and that what we perceive as causes and effects in the world are merely occasions for God’s direct intervention. They deny that created entities have any intrinsic causal power or secondary causation. In other words, God creates the cause and the effect at each moment independent of the material 5. objects that seem to be involved. 6. Morality is arbitrarily based on Allah’s سُبْحَانَهُ وَتَعَالَىٰ will i.e. absolu
Read more

Overview of Athari Metaphysics

Image
Overview of Athari Metaphysics Metaphysics, the study of the fundamental nature of reality and existence, presents significant challenges and complexities. Within the realm of metaphysics, the Athari, a school of thought in Sunni Islam, perspective offers a unique approach to understanding the attributes and actions ascribed to Allah, or God. This overview explores the fundamental principles of their (and also my) metaphysics, including the distinction between the different types of predications when describing God’s attributes. It also considers the role of rational arguments alongside textual proofs for the existence of God and questions the concept of Divine Simplicity. Additionally, the overview delves into the uncreated nature of the Quran and the understanding of God's actions within His essence. By examining Athari metaphysics, we gain insights into the nuanced interpretation of divine attributes and deepen our understanding of God’s unknowable essence. The Athari view d
Read more

Challenging the Trinity: Indexicals and the Leftow Dilemma

Image
Challenging the Trinity: Indexicals and the Leftow Dilemma     The Doctrine of the Trinity stands as a central tenet of Christian belief, positing the existence of three distinct persons—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—within the divine unity of God. However, a nuanced examination reveals intriguing challenges that will be discussed in detail. This blog post will present two more arguments against the Doctrine of the Trinity. I have already discussed the Logical Problem of the Trinity (LPT) and how the Trinity contradicts Divine Simplicity elsewhere on my blog.   The Argument from Indexicals:   Indexical: A linguistic expression whose reference can change based on the context. Examples of indexicals include I, he, she, here, that, etc. If Person A says I am happy and Person B utters the same sentence, even though the sentence is the same, Person A is saying it while person B is saying it. In the orthodox conception of the doctrine of the Trinity, there is only one mind or one will in the
Read more