Rethinking Postmodernism

Postmodernism is characterized by a rejection of objective values, skepticism towards the idea of truth, and a distrust of grand narratives. Postmodernists argue that power is unevenly distributed in society which is embedded in our culture, politics, and society as whole. This power structure shapes people’s identities and worldviews. They question authority claims and attempt to expose ways in which power is used to oppress marginalized groups and make the powerful more powerful. However, their critiques are filled with obscure philosophy that alienates the marginalized groups they attempt to rescue through their radical stances. With such radical ideas one may question their sincerity. Are they motivated by their will to power, material reward, or the benefit of society? Each postmodernist has created a unique language, forming unconsciously cult-like communities where members could mimic presenting academic findings without truly understanding each other. Meanwhile, when presenting their ideas to the public, they resort to shock tactics to give credence to their provocative concepts about society which then implicitly charges those who do not understand their inadequate contradictions. Meanwhile, they obstruct actual activism thus preventing third-world countries from stabilizing in favor of endless theoretical debates of moral relativism and abstract discussions of suspicions against reason . The rejection of universal values hinders the development of shared traditional principles essential for social cohesion. This irony leads to the challenge of navigating the thin line between deconstruction and nihilism where the rejection of all objectivity leaves a void rather than a foundation for positive societal change. Considering its adverse impact on intellectual discourse and societal progress, there is a compelling case for the reconsideration and potential displacement of the entire post-modernist movement.